Please support our beis medrash https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=SMGXBETTK3Z94 make a monthly membership Membership Levels This Shiur Also On Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Listen by phone: call (848) 285-6807, press 6, then 500155#

This shiur examines the fundamental question of Jewish identity: are we defined by the Exodus from Egypt or by receiving the Torah at Sinai? The instructor argues that while contemporary Jews primarily identify through Torah and mitzvot, the biblical text consistently emphasizes yetziat Mitzrayim as God’s primary identification. The Rambam’s approach is analyzed in depth, explaining how the Exodus represented a revolutionary system: the prohibition of avodah zarah (idolatry) and the establishment of direct service to God, creating a framework that could be transmitted to children across generations. This stands in contrast to the pre-Abrahamic world where knowledge of God was limited to exceptional individuals who would inevitably be forgotten. The shiur explores how Moshe Rabbeinu’s innovation at the Exodus wasn’t merely philosophical knowledge of God, but rather a practical system ensuring that even simple people and children would maintain pure monotheism, distinguishing Judaism fundamentally from other religions that may acknowledge one God philosophically but teach their children about intermediary powers. Please support our beis medrash https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=SMGXBETTK3Z94 make a monthly membership Membership Levels This Shiur Also On Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Read Transcript Hebrew Transcript Listen by phone: call (848) 285-6807, press 6, then 500152#

This shiur examines a fundamental question raised by the Chazon Ish about the nature of middos (character traits): why do we treat virtues like courage, humility, or temperance as separate good qualities when being truly good requires all of them together? The discussion challenges the common assumption that you can work on individual middos separately, arguing instead that genuine virtue is unified – either you’re guided by intellect and reason (and thus have all good middos), or you’re driven by natural inclinations (and your seemingly “good” traits are just natural dispositions, not real virtues). Drawing on Socratic and Aristotelian philosophy, the shiur distinguishes between natural traits that happen to look good and authentic moral excellence that comes from living according to reason, ultimately questioning whether the standard mussar approach of working on one middah per month makes philosophical sense. This Shiur Also On Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Read Transcript Hebrew Transcript

This shiur on Shemonah Perakim Chapter 4 examines the Rambam’s introduction to his list of character traits and addresses a fundamental tension between halacha and mussar. The Chazon Ish’s approach is analyzed through a case study of two yeshivos competing in the same neighborhood, revealing how the concept of “naval birshus haTorah” (scoundrel within Torah’s permission) is often misunderstood. The core argument challenges the modern mussar movement’s assumption that being a “good person” is defined by internal character traits independent of halacha, demonstrating instead that genuine ethical behavior requires external objective standards – specifically Torah law – to determine what is actually right and just. The discussion includes analysis of why people feel more certain about their righteousness in high-stakes situations (like million-dollar disputes) versus small ones, and why the feeling of justice doesn’t determine what truly belongs to whom. This Shiur Also On Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Read Transcript Hebrew Transcript

מצוות זכור איז די מידה פנימית פאר מצוות מחיית עמלק

This shiur examines the definition of goodness (gutskait) and argues that most moral failures stem not from wickedness or battling the yetzer hara, but from a fundamental blindness — an inability to recognize that a familiar ethical principle actually applies to the situation right in front of you. Using the parable of a rabbi who knows all the halachos of treifos but can’t identify the actual karkavan (gizzard), the shiur illustrates how people can master abstract Torah concepts yet completely fail to connect them to real-life cases, whether in business disputes, communal leadership, or interpersonal relationships. The practical takeaway: acquiring true da’as — the capacity to bridge theory and reality — requires both broad learning across halacha and shimush chachamim (apprenticing with wise people), not just working on one’s middos as if every problem is a spiritual battle. Related Content Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Read Transcript Hebrew Transcript

דער שיעור גייט אריין אין דעם רמב״ן׳ס טיפן פירוש אויף פרשת משפטים, וויאזוי “ואלה המשפטים” איז א פירוש אויף “לא תחמוד” – אז מען דארף וויסן וועמען עס באלאנגט צו כדי נישט צו באגערן יענעמס זאכן. דער מגיד שיעור ברענגט ארויס שטארקע מוסר השכלים וועגן “בלינדע פלעקן” ביי ערליכע אידן – ווי מען קען זיין מדקדק אין קליינע חומרות אבער פארזען גרויסע עבירות אין חושן משפט, ספעציעל בנוגע יתומים, אלמנות, און טעגליכע ביזנעס-ענינים וואס מען טראכט נישט אז עס איז בכלל א שאלה. עפענען די אויגען צו זעהן וויפיל זאכן זענען לא תגנוב – רמב״ן שמשפטים הוא פירוש לא תחמוד Related Content Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Read Transcript Hebrew Transcript

אין דעם שיעור ווערט באלויכטן די טיפע פראגע: ווער איז טאקע א “גוטער מענטש”? דער רעדנער צעברעכט די אילוזיע אז “האלטן” אז מען דארף זיין גוט איז גענוג, און ער ווייזט אז אמת׳ע בחירה איז א פראצעס וואס נעמט צייט – מען דארף אויסטרייען, זיך מתייעץ זיין, און ערלעך מודה זיין “איך ווייס נישט” איידער מען קען טאקע וויסן וואס מען וויל. א שטארקע מוסר-השכל פאר יעדן וואס וויל אויפהערן זיך נארן און אנהייבן נעמען אחריות פאר זיינע מעשים. מען דארף מאכן טעותים צו קענען האבען בחירה Related Content Watch on YouTube Watch on Website Read Transcript Hebrew Transcript

הרגלים מאכן בחירה נישט אוטומאטיש Related Content Watch on YouTube Video Post Read Transcript Hebrew Translation